Medicine Lake Victory
Ninth Circuit Reverses Lower Court Ruling Halts Development
on 10,000-Year-Old Sacred Site at Medicine Lake
MOUNT SHASTA, Calif., Nov. 9 (AScribe Newswire) -- The Pit River Tribe won a
major victory in their long-term struggle to protect a sacred site near Medicine
Lake in Northeastern California from energy development this week, when the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a lower court ruling and
rejected renewed energy leases made by the federal government to a private
company. The Pit River Tribe is plaintiff along with the Native Coalition for
Medicine Lake Highlands Defense and the Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center.
The group is represented by the Stanford Legal Clinic at Stanford Law
School.
In an opinion issued by Judge J. Clifford Wallace, the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Ninth Circuit determined that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and
U.S. Forest Service unlawfully failed to consult with the Pit River Tribe and
undertake appropriate environmental review before deciding to execute energy
leases in 1998 to a private company on
this 10,000-year-old sacred landscape. The leases had granted Calpine
Corporation rights to develop geothermal power near Fourmile Hill in the
Medicine Lake Highlands, about 30 miles northeast of Mount Shasta in northern
California.
The Ninth Circuit's decision reverses a 2004 adverse decision from the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of California, and orders the lower
court to enter summary judgment in favor of the Pit River Tribe on all issues on
appeal. The decision agreed with arguments presented by the Environmental Law
Clinic within the Stanford Legal Clinic, which had argued that BLM and the U.S.
Forest Service had violated environmental and cultural preservation laws when
the agencies granted a 40-year extension on the leases.
"The Court's decision vindicates the Pit River Tribe's decade-long struggle to
protect the sacred Medicine Lake landscape from unreflective industrial
development," said Deborah Sivas, director of the Environmental Law Clinic at
Stanford Law School, and counsel of record. "The area has been an integral part
of the Tribe's cultural and spiritual traditions for over 10,000 years, and the
federal government plainly owes a high fiduciary duty to the region's Indian
Tribes when managing the National Forests there. The Court agreed with the
Native American and environmental plaintiffs that, of course, the federal
agencies must formally consult with the Pit River Tribe and undertake
appropriate environmental review before irrevocably leasing the public's
resources for private energy development."
Judge J. Clifford Wallace, who wrote the opinion on behalf of the
three-circuit-judge panel that also included judges Kim McLane Wardlaw and
Sidney R. Thomas, acknowledged the "great spiritual significance" of the
Medicine Lake Highlands to the Pit River Tribe and to the other Native American
tribes in the region, who "continue to use numerous important spiritual and
cultural sites within the highlands."
Gene Preston of the Pit River Tribal Council said, "We are only the transient
stewards of this land, picking up the sacred thread from our ancestors, and
making sure it stays sacred for generations to come. This decision is
significant locally, nationwide and even internationally, through all the
friends who have given their support - the National Congress of American Indians
all the way to International Indian Treaty Council. We hope this ruling will
help in other similar cases where sacred lands are in jeopardy."
The case involved a 49-megawatt geothermal project proposed by San Jose-based
Calpine Corporation on leases covering about eight square miles near Fourmile
Hill, just over the edge of the Medicine Lake Caldera. But the Ninth Circuit
decision has implications for a much greater area. After the leases were
renewed, the Medicine Lake Highlands--an area covering about 113 square
miles--were designated as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places
as a Traditional Cultural Area. Calpine's total lease holdings cover about half
the area, or 66 square miles, and were approved through a similar process as the
Fourmile Hill leases. Calpine has stated plans to generate 500 to 1,000
megawatts in the Highlands by exploiting hot magma and fluids believed to exist
9,000 to 11,000 feet underground.
A second geothermal project located at Telephone Flat within the pristine
Medicine Lake Caldera was at first denied by local decision makers, and then
approved in 2002 at the Washington, D.C. level. The plaintiffs have a pending
lawsuit challenging the Telephone Flat project on similar grounds as the current
Fourmile Hill case. The Telephone Flat lawsuit was automatically stayed when
Calpine filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in 2005 and became the eighth
largest public company to file for bankruptcy in U.S. history with assets
reported at $26.6 billion, but the tribe and environmentalists have plans to
reactivate that claim.
The geothermal projects have been hotly debated ever since they came to public
attention in 1997. Native American and environmental plaintiffs see the Fourmile
Hill project as only the first of many projects that would permanently damage
this geologically unique and pristine area, transforming the Medicine Lake
Highlands into an the industrial wasteland with multiple power plants, noisy
24-hour drilling, landscape-fragmenting pipelines, toxic plumes exuding
dangerous levels of arsenic, mercury and hydrogen sulfide, and would constitute
a major threat to the huge pure aquifer that feeds California's largest spring
system.
Over 90 percent of public comment letters have opposed the projects, and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, commenting on the Telephone Flat
project, stated, "The costs to the historic resources of Native Americans and
our nation are too high."
"We have fought these projects for a decade because we cannot let this
desecration happen. The Medicine Lake Highlands are a landscape of the spirit,"
said Michelle Berditschevsky, Environmental Coordinator for the Pit River Tribe
and Director of the Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center. "This area is
critical to the cultural continuity of tribes near
and far, as well as to people from all over the nation, because it symbolizes a
world view that must be preserved at a time when resource extraction seeks to
infringe on everything sacred. It is a place where mystery can be tangibly felt,
where industrial blight and noise have not drowned out spiritual qualities. It
exudes a feeling of eternity. It represents our sanity and healing, our
commitment to keeping beauty and peace alive in our world."
ABOUT THE MOUNT SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY CENTER:
The Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center is a grassroots nonprofit
organization dedicated to protecting and restoring the exceptional natural and
cultural values of Mount Shasta, one of the sacred mountains of the world, of
the Medicine Lake Highlands, and of the surrounding bioregion. This region is
valuable as a major source of pure waters to the entire state of California. It
is important locally, nationally and internationally in providing pristine
natural sanctuaries that contain rich biodiversity and sacred areas of high
significance to Native American cultures near and far. The Ecology Center's
website is at
http://www.mountshastaecology.org .
ABOUT STANFORD LAW SCHOOL:
Stanford Law School is one of the nation's leading institutions for legal
scholarship and education. Its alumni are among the most influential decision
makers in law, politics, business, and high technology. Faculty members argue
before the Supreme Court, testify before Congress, and write books and articles
for academic audiences, as well as the popular press. Along with offering
traditional law school classes, the school has embraced new subjects and new
ways of teaching. The school's home page is located at
http://www.law.stanford.edu .
ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CLINIC AT STANFORD:
Stanford Law School offers a variety of clinics that litigate in specialized
fields, including environmental protection, immigrants' rights, community law,
cyber-law, and educational advocacy. The clinics provide pro bono representation
and operate cohesively as a single law firm, the Stanford Legal Clinic (SLC).
The SLC provides students an opportunity to apply classroom theory to real
client situations and to develop a lifelong commitment to public service values.
The Environmental Law Clinic enables students to provide legal assistance to
nonprofit organizations on a variety of environmental issues, focusing primarily
on natural resource conservation. The clinic's clients include large national
environmental organizations and a variety of regional and local grassroots
groups. Students in the clinic work under the supervision of practicing
environmental attorneys on a variety of tasks, including: screening and
investigating new matters; assisting clients in the development of legal
strategies; drafting comment letters; petitions, complaints and briefs; and
presenting testimony or argument before administrative boards and state and
federal courts. Students routinely argue cases in state and federal courts and
before administrative agency tribunals.
Case: Pit River Tribe, et al. v. United States Forest Service, et al., United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 04-15746.
CONTACTS:
Pit River Tribe: Michelle Berditschevsky, Pit River Tribe
Environmental Coordinator, 530-335-5062 x1, or Sharon Elmore, Cultural
Information Officer, 530-335-5062 x2
Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center: Peggy Risch,
530-926-5655, or Michelle Berditschevsky, 530-926-3397
Stanford Legal Clinic: Deborah Sivas, Director of the
Environmental Law Clinic and Lecturer in Law, 650-723-0325,
dsivas@stanford.edu
Stanford Law School: Judith Romero, Associate Director of Media
Relations, 650-723-2232,
Judith.romero@stanford.edu
Submitted by Andrea Cramblit, IndigenousNewsNetwork@topica.com